Looking at the EU through the Eyes of Pope Francis’ Fratelli Tutti: A Call for Ethical Reform

Abstract
This article examines the European Union’s migration policies through the ethical lens provided by Pope Francis’ encyclical Fratelli Tutti. It argues that the EU’s current approach to migration, particularly concerning African migrants, reflects a pattern of exploitation and hypocrisy that contradicts the principles of solidarity and human dignity espoused by Pope Francis. Drawing on Pope Francis’ admonitions against exploitation and discrimination, as well as his call for global solidarity, the article critiques the EU’s reliance on multinational corporations for resource extraction in Africa while simultaneously imposing harsh migration restrictions on African individuals seeking entry into Europe. Furthermore, it highlights the disparity in treatment between African and Asian migrants, revealing a troubling double standard that prioritizes economic interests over human rights.

Introduction
The European Union (EU) has long positioned itself as a champion of human rights and global solidarity. However, its migration policies, particularly regarding African migrants, raise significant ethical concerns. In this article, we examine the EU’s migration practices through the moral framework articulated in Pope Francis’ encyclical Fratelli Tutti. By juxtaposing the EU’s actions with the teachings of Pope Francis, we aim to shed light on the ethical inconsistencies that underlie current EU migration policies and advocate for a more just and compassionate approach.

Exploitative Practices and Hypocrisy
The EU’s engagement with Africa is characterized by a troubling pattern of exploitation and hypocrisy. On one hand, EU member states benefit from the extraction of natural resources in Africa, often facilitated through partnerships with multinational corporations. This economic relationship, however, is marked by unequal power dynamics and environmental degradation, depriving local communities of their rightful share of resources and perpetuating cycles of poverty.
Simultaneously, the EU adopts stringent border control measures that disproportionately affect African migrants seeking entry into Europe. These policies, which include detention centers, deportation procedures, and externalization agreements with third countries, reflect a prioritization of security concerns over the rights and dignity of migrants. Despite espousing values of equality and justice, the EU’s treatment of African migrants reveals a glaring hypocrisy that undermines its moral authority.

A Double Standard
Further exacerbating the ethical quandary is the differential treatment of African and Asian migrants by EU member states. While African migrants face barriers to entry and are subject to discriminatory practices, Asian migrants often encounter more lenient immigration policies. Moreover, the EU’s outsourcing of industries to Asia while continuing to extract critical resources from Africa exemplifies a blatant disregard for the well-being of African nations.
In the wake of the EU’s negotiation of a deal with Turkey for stemming the refugee influx, Lebanese and Jordanian policy-makers criticized the creation of ‘refugee overburdened zones’. Lebanon has already borne more than its share of the burden, while Jordan suggested it could have negotiated a better deal with the EU as Turkey did.

The EU as an Abusive Partner
In light of these observations, it is evident that the EU’s behavior towards Africa mirrors that of an abusive partner. Despite rhetoric espousing partnership and cooperation, the EU’s actions betray a self-serving agenda that prioritizes its own interests at the expense of African nations and their citizens. Pope Francis’ call to recognize the inherent dignity of every human being and to prioritize the common good provides a stark contrast to the EU’s exploitative and discriminatory practices.

Conclusion
The EU’s migration policies must be reassessed in light of the ethical imperatives outlined in Fratelli Tutti. It is incumbent upon EU member states to uphold the principles of solidarity, justice, and respect for human dignity in their treatment of migrants, particularly those from Africa. This necessitates a departure from exploitative practices and a commitment to genuine partnership and cooperation with African nations. Only by aligning its actions with its professed values can the EU truly embody the spirit of fraternity and solidarity advocated by Pope Francis.

Bibliography
Bakewell, O. (2000). Repatriation and self-settled refugees in Zambia: Bringing solutions to the wrong problems. Journal of Refugee Studies, 13(4), 356–373.
Briguglio, L., & Brown, M. (2022). Migration and Human Dignity in the Mediterranean. Mediterranean Journal of Human Rights.
Cohen, R. (1987). The new helots: Migrants in the international division of labour. Gower.
De Haas, H. (2010). Migration transitions: A theoretical and empirical inquiry into the developmental drivers of international migration. IMI Working Paper Series.
Dionigi, F. (2017). The Syrian refugee crisis in Lebanon: State fragility and social resilience. LSE Middle East Centre Paper Series.
Fassi, E., & Lucarelli, S. (2020). The EU’s external migration policy: The role of moral norms in EU–Turkey relations. European Foreign Affairs Review.
Ghosh, B. (2010). The Global Economic Crisis and Migration: Where Do We Go from Here?. IOM Migration Research Series.
Groody, D. (2015). Globalization, Spirituality, and Justice: Navigating the Path to Peace. Orbis Books.
Kulska, J. (2020). Solidarity or exclusion? Migration policy and the EU’s identity. International Journal of Social Science Studies.
Natter, K. (2014). Fifty years of Maghreb emigration: How states shaped Algerian, Moroccan and Tunisian emigration. IMI Working Paper Series.
Özden, Ç., Parsons, C. R., Schiff, M., & Walmsley, T. L. (2011). Where on Earth is Everybody? The Evolution of Global Bilateral Migration 1960–2000. World Bank Economic Review.
Samers, M. (1997). The ‘new immigration’ and the state: The deconstruction and reconstitution of politics in France. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers.
Teodorescu, D. (2018). EU Migration Policies and Challenges. European Journal of Migration and Law.
Vezzoli, S., Villares-Varela, M., & De Haas, H. (2014). Uncovering international migration flow data: Insights from the DEMIG databases. IMI Working Paper Series.
Zolberg, A. R., Suhrke, A., & Aguayo, S. (1989). Escape from Violence: Conflict and the Refugee Crisis in the Developing World. Oxford University Press.